d e e p t ! ([info]diffdrummer) wrote,
@ 2008-12-11 08:08:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:blog

A Blog Burnout : Exclusive Live Coverage
Burnout: Physical or emotional exhaustion, especially as a result of long-term stress or dissipation.

Blogs remind me of pets. Some blogs are cats, some are dogs, some are gold fish and some are hamsters. In my mind they are different in almost every way except a few. One, we keep them for companionship. Two, they have a much shorter life span compared to us, humans. Three, you have to feed and nurture them, otherwise they kick the bucket sooner than expected.

A healthy human being might go through a series of pets in her/his life if s/he choose to have them. They die too early for our liking. Same seems to be happening to blogs, the few I’ve known. Mine is awaiting a messiah who specializes in reincarnation and other related digital tricks.

Some of the oldest ‘friended’ journals are still going slow and steady like pet turtles, but that’s pretty much about it. I can feel the old order dying amidst terse tweeting from remote corners.( 12:10pm: I pooped 2:10pm: Chillin' at work ....) There are journals who immigrated to greener pastures, taking permanent citizenship in places where they press word and look pretty. Out of sight, out of mind.

Then there is commenting - the holy activity that ensures a steady stream of the faithful. It has undergone drastic cut-backs. Don’t be fooled by the fuel prices, this is a real energy crisis. I can’t bring myself to tap a few well-meaning lines to fellow journalists(?). A shame, when you consider I do this tapping for a living. But then again a strong anti-social 'charisma' has always been the selling point of this LJ :P

There is no dearth of topics to write on, only an obstinate exhaustion that has come to pervade my days. But one thing is sure everyone loves to witness a burn-out, like the girl in the picture. You might have read thru' this whole post thinking that it has something to do with the blonde. Not really. It's just that there are so many gentlemen in my friends list.




(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]tko_ak
2008-12-11 06:19 pm UTC (link)
So what pet is my journal?

Sometimes people need a break, and that refreshes them. But many people I know have long time journals, are still active commenters, and have made many friends, who may have transformed to in-person relationships.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-11 06:31 pm UTC (link)
Could be a turtle, parrot or owl. Leave out the turtle, it is slow, might not be a good fit for a prolific blogger as you. Take a pick from the other two :)

I have seen long time, regular journals like yours amongst the people I know. The commonality I see in them is that they usually belong to two specific age groups. First is a 15-30 group who are not married or into a serious relationship. The second group is almost middle-aged,settled-in-life-now-has-time-to-blog.

I am not saying other age groups don't blog, but they are not reliable enough to churn out posts at a regular frequency over a long period of time, more like shooting stars that last for 2-3 years.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tko_ak
2008-12-11 06:37 pm UTC (link)
Parrot or owl, huh? What are those traits?

I don't post near as often as I used to. It used to be two or three times a day. I'm more tempered than I used to be.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-11 06:58 pm UTC (link)
Both are long-living(50+ years) if treated well and intelligent.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]appughar.wordpress.com
2008-12-13 07:32 am UTC (link)
Hey, I am in 15-30 married category. I take serious offense to your taxonomy :-p

I think the real problem (at least with me) is the cardinality of the blog feeds have been on the rise pretty rapidly in the recent past. For example, I had 100+ new feeds waiting in my client when I checked today morning. My natural tendency is to select them all as marked.

There is an attitude shift coming across in the way we see blogging. Three years ago, the sense of community and urge to form new friends via web was stronger. I kept track of around 30-40 blogs at the maximum (as opposed to 300+ now), and to a certain extend tried to connect with each one of them. In fact, I still remember some of the conversations we used to have in lj during that time. It was then an active dialogue with friends and family as opposed to passive dialogue (if any) with strangers now.

Finally, this is a thread that resembles one from lj 2-3 years back :-D.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-16 05:35 pm UTC (link)
"cardinality" of blog feeds - without a question, the writer of the comment has a PhD :P

I was checking your wordpress blog, none of the LJ inertia (of rest) there. Or is it because it is a new venture? Wish you luck in keeping the momentum. It is good to see 'old' timers blog frequently. But I still wish I could add it to my LJ friends list ;))

Feed readers were fun to start with. A one-stop-shop for the blogs you like to read. But then somewhere along the way, the novelty wore out.I do the same as you these days, skim over a few, then 'mark all as read.'

The evolution of blogging(or rather the entire concept of virtual social networks) is an interesting watch. I wonder where all it'd take us.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]appughar
2008-12-17 06:04 am UTC (link)
"cardinality" of blog feeds - without a question, the writer of the comment has a PhD :P

The research lingo creeping up in my day today conversation has started to become a big problem. Whenever, I am outside campus I get the feeling that I am impaired in conversation skills :-o

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]rileen
2008-12-11 07:34 pm UTC (link)
As your post appeared at the top of the page, I didn't even see the blonde until the post was nearing its end - but then, I'm not that much of a gentleman either :-p

I'm definitely going to keep posting, but the frequency shall remain low, as the busiest year of my life so far shall likely be followed by one even busier.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-11 07:45 pm UTC (link)
Haha. Maybe you are the rare kind of gentlemen who has a different preference when it comes to hair color :P

I see your posts or rather updates on life, intermittently. Maybe because it is your busiest year as you say, but everybody seems to have lost their tempo. I for one, have stopped commenting the oldest blog friends, taking them for granted(my bad), kind of like family - you are confident they'll be there even if you don't pay them the attention you have to show on a first date :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rileen
2008-12-11 07:51 pm UTC (link)
I don't think I have any strong preference when it comes to hair colour, but I do usually find unnatural colours like pink, blue etc. jarring.

Well, not all my posts are updates on life :-), in fact maybe not even half. But anyway - I do intend to post within a week, let's see if I manage to.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-11 08:02 pm UTC (link)
I do usually find unnatural colours like pink, blue etc. jarring.
Punk Rockers Assc. has demanded an apology from you and has issued a statement banning their groupies to date you ;D

Well, not all my posts are updates on life :-), in fact maybe not even half I went back and checked your journal, you are right! Somehow when I tried to recollect your recent posts, your life updates were what that sprang to mind. Blame speed reading.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rileen
2008-12-11 08:05 pm UTC (link)
Well, at least that means you remember a bit of the life updates :-p

I guess I'll just have to manage without punk rockers, then :-| :-p

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]navina
2008-12-11 08:58 pm UTC (link)
:-)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-12 04:48 pm UTC (link)
;-) good to see you

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]smriti
2008-12-12 05:45 am UTC (link)
:-)

more like shooting stars that last for 2-3 years.
So, yes, and there is another type of star that dies out in 4-5 years. The old 5+ year LJ-faithful: they best fit your "take for granted like family" description. We might have a whole taxonomy here.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-12 04:47 pm UTC (link)
Right, 5+ year old faithful are the majority in my list(including me - because I did 90% of my 'friending' in the first year.) 2-3 year classification came from the fact that most of these are more prolific during the first 3 years, then it is the burn-out phase of the shooting star - one post a month/two months/3 months.Yes, blogger taxonomy might be an interesting topic to work on for a social-scientist:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shradha
2008-12-12 08:45 pm UTC (link)
awww...loved ur post so much that i had to stop by and yes, comment.
dont have much to say but perhaps just leave a smile and say i love reading ur blog :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]diffdrummer
2008-12-16 04:40 pm UTC (link)
Shradha, appreciate your words and you stopping by. I do get a glimpse of you life now and then from the intermittent posts you make. Hope to see them once in a while :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…